<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media and what makes it &#8220;New&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wursty.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/media-and-what-makes-it-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wursty.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/media-and-what-makes-it-new/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:26:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Gerage</title>
		<link>http://wursty.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/media-and-what-makes-it-new/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Gerage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 20:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wursty.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I like the different approach you took to addressing the connectedness of old and new media.  Your examples, which I believe were also brought up in class, certainly show that our new media cannot thrive without the old, established mediums.  With this in mind, I can&#039;t imagine a new media completely independent from the old.  Everything seems to be a continuing or improvement from something already created, no matter how innovative it may appear to be.  It&#039;s a unique way of looking at the argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the different approach you took to addressing the connectedness of old and new media.  Your examples, which I believe were also brought up in class, certainly show that our new media cannot thrive without the old, established mediums.  With this in mind, I can&#8217;t imagine a new media completely independent from the old.  Everything seems to be a continuing or improvement from something already created, no matter how innovative it may appear to be.  It&#8217;s a unique way of looking at the argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrienne</title>
		<link>http://wursty.wordpress.com/2008/09/07/media-and-what-makes-it-new/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 19:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wursty.wordpress.com/?p=8#comment-2</guid>
		<description>You mention that new media &quot;...would require a completely new approach, idea, and language.&quot;  What might be one critique of this belief?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention that new media &#8220;&#8230;would require a completely new approach, idea, and language.&#8221;  What might be one critique of this belief?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
